Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Celeron 570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 570
2008
31 Watt
0.20
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 280 Watt
19.06
+9430%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron 570 by a whopping 9430% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3447345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency0.272.88
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameno dataCastle Peak (2020)
Release date1 April 2008 (17 years ago)14 July 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threadsno data24
Base clock speed2.26 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data40
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache64 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data2x 74 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data7,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 570 0.20
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 19.06
+9430%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 570 344
Samples: 9
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 33494
+9637%
Samples: 176

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 19.06
Recency 1 April 2008 14 July 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron 570 has 803.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, on the other hand, has a 9430% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 570 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 570 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 570
Celeron 570
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 570 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.