Ryzen 9 5900H vs Celeron 570

Place in the ranking	3191	582
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency	0.67	27.21
Architecture codename	no data	Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
Release date	1 April 2008 (16 years ago)	7 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 570 and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	no data	16
Base clock speed	2.26 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	no data	4.6 GHz
L1 cache	no data	512 KB
L2 cache	no data	4 MB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 Cache	16 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	7 nm
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 570 and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	FP6
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 570 and Ryzen 9 5900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen 9 5900H are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 570 0.22

Ryzen 9 5900H 12.94
+5782%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 570 344

Ryzen 9 5900H 20557
+5876%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.22	12.94
Recency	1 April 2008	7 January 2021
Chip lithography	65 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	45 Watt

Celeron 570 has 45.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5900H, on the other hand, has a 5781.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 5900H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 570 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 570 and Ryzen 9 5900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.