Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs Celeron 570
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Celeron 570 by a whopping 3005% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3463 | 1218 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 0.27 | 4.05 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 1 April 2008 (17 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 570 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 38 |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 570 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 570 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 570 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 6.21 |
| Recency | 1 April 2008 | 21 July 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron 570 has 109.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, on the other hand, has a 3005% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 570 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 570 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
