Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Celeron 570
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 223 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.92 |
| Release date | 1 April 2008 (16 years ago) | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.06 GHz |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 92000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 78 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2008 | 30 October 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 78 Watt |
Celeron 570 has 151.6% lower power consumption.
Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 570 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
