Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Celeron 560
Aggregate performance score
M4 Max (14 cores) outperforms Celeron 560 by a whopping 11416% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3499 | 304 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 0.66 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Apple |
| Release date | 1 January 2008 (17 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 560 and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.51 GHz |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 560 and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 4 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 560 and M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 560 and M4 Max (14 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 560 and M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.19 | 21.88 |
| Recency | 1 January 2008 | 30 November 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 4 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) has a 11415.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 675% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 560 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
