5 220H vs Celeron 5305U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Release date1 April 2020 (4 years ago)18 December 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$342

Detailed specifications

Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.9 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data18 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2020 18 December 2024
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron 5305U has 200% lower power consumption.

5 220H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 5305U and Core 5 220H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 5305U
Celeron 5305U
Intel Core 5 220H
Core 5 220H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 5305U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 220H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 5305U or Core 5 220H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.