EPYC 7313 vs Celeron 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 450
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.27
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
24.04
+8804%

EPYC 7313 outperforms Celeron 450 by a whopping 8804% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3303253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.15
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.7414.96
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)15 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm+
Die size77 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 450 0.27
EPYC 7313 24.04
+8804%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 450 433
EPYC 7313 38644
+8825%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 450 159
EPYC 7313 1502
+845%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 450 161
EPYC 7313 11288
+6911%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 24.04
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 155 Watt

Celeron 450 has 342.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 8803.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 450 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 450 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 450
Celeron 450
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 45 votes

Rate Celeron 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 votes

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 450 and EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.