Celeron 2950M vs 445
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2643 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.98 |
| Architecture codename | Conroe-CL (2008) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | May 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 September 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $75 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 76 mm2 | 118 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 771 | FCPGA946 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 37 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| VGA | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 37 Watt |
Celeron 2950M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 75.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 445 is a desktop processor while Celeron 2950M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 445 and Celeron 2950M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
