Xeon E-2378 vs Celeron 440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 440
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.23
Xeon E-2378
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.91
+4643%

Xeon E-2378 outperforms Celeron 440 by a whopping 4643% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3192712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.6316.00
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature60 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 440 0.23
Xeon E-2378 10.91
+4643%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 440 368
Xeon E-2378 17472
+4648%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 10.91
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 440 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2378, on the other hand, has a 4643.5% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E-2378 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 440 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 440 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2378 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 440 and Xeon E-2378, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 440
Celeron 440
Intel Xeon E-2378
Xeon E-2378

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 60 votes

Rate Celeron 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 9 votes

Rate Xeon E-2378 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 440 or Xeon E-2378, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.