Xeon E7-4890 v3 vs Celeron 4305UE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2708 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.99 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 6.87 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| Release date | 1 October 2018 (7 years ago) | 1 June 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron 4305UE and Xeon E7-4890 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 45 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 160 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 4305UE and Xeon E7-4890 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1528 | 1150 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and Xeon E7-4890 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 4305UE and Xeon E7-4890 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and Xeon E7-4890 v3 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and Xeon E7-4890 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and Xeon E7-4890 v3.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2018 | 1 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 18 |
| Threads | 2 | 36 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 165 Watt |
Celeron 4305UE has an age advantage of 3 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 1000% lower power consumption.
Xeon E7-4890 v3, on the other hand, has 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 4305UE and Intel Xeon E7-4890 v3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while Xeon E7-4890 v3 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
