Athlon X2 QL-65 vs Celeron 4305UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96
+174%

Celeron 4305UE outperforms Athlon X2 QL-65 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27013308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency6.86no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date1 October 2018 (7 years ago)1 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and Athlon X2 QL-65 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and Athlon X2 QL-65 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1528S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon X2 QL-65. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon X2 QL-65 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon X2 QL-65. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon X2 QL-65.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 4305UE 0.96
+174%
Athlon X2 QL-65 0.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 4305UE 1699
+179%
Samples: 5
Athlon X2 QL-65 609

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.35
Recency 1 October 2018 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 10 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 1 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has a 174.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon X2 QL-65, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron 4305UE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 4305UE and Athlon X2 QL-65, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.