Athlon II X2 250 vs Celeron 4305UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.97
+59%

Celeron 4305UE outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26662984
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.213.61
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.730.40
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date1 October 2018 (7 years ago)2 June 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 250 has 198% better value for money than Celeron 4305UE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and Athlon II X2 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and Athlon II X2 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1528AM3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon II X2 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon II X2 250 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon II X2 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and Athlon II X2 250.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 4305UE 0.97
+59%
Athlon II X2 250 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 4305UE 1699
+57.3%
Samples: 5
Athlon II X2 250 1080
Samples: 1799

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 4305UE 668
+124%
Athlon II X2 250 298

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 4305UE 1086
+110%
Athlon II X2 250 516

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 0.61
Recency 1 October 2018 2 June 2009
Chip lithography 10 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has a 59% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron 4305UE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II X2 250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 250 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Athlon II X2 250

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1275 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 4305UE and Athlon II X2 250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.