A6-3500 vs Celeron 4305UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96
+17.1%

Celeron 4305UE outperforms A6-3500 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27052827
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.03no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.861.35
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 October 2018 (7 years ago)17 August 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and A6-3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and A6-3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1528FM1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and A6-3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and A6-3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and A6-3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610Radeon HD 6530D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and A6-3500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 4305UE 0.96
+17.1%
A6-3500 0.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 4305UE 1699
+18.1%
Samples: 5
A6-3500 1439
Samples: 284

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 4305UE 668
+152%
A6-3500 265

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 4305UE 1086
+74.6%
A6-3500 622

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.82
Recency 1 October 2018 17 August 2011
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has a 17.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

A6-3500, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Intel Celeron 4305UE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while A6-3500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD A6-3500
A6-3500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 139 votes

Rate A6-3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 4305UE and A6-3500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.