Processor N200 vs Celeron 430

Place in the ranking	3261	2123
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency	0.49	24.61
Architecture codename	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date	June 2007 (17 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$50	$193

Detailed specifications

Celeron 430 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	1	4
Base clock speed	1.8 GHz	0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.8 GHz	3.7 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB	96 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	2 MB (shared)
L3 cache	0 KB	6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm
Die size	77 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	60 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	105 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
VID voltage range	1V-1.3375V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 430 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 430 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 430 and Processor N200.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.18	1.56
Physical cores	1	4
Threads	1	4
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

Processor N200 has a 766.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 430 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 430 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.