Celeron B710 vs 430

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 430
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18
+157%
Celeron B710
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.07

Celeron 430 outperforms Celeron B710 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 430 and Celeron B710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32603404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.490.19
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50$70

Detailed specifications

Celeron 430 and Celeron B710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size77 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °C100 °C
Number of transistors105 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 430 and Celeron B710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775PGA988,PPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Celeron B710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 430 and Celeron B710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Celeron B710 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Celeron B710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 430 and Celeron B710 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 430 and Celeron B710.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 430 0.18
+157%
Celeron B710 0.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 430 289
+173%
Celeron B710 106

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 0.07
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm

Celeron 430 has a 157.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron B710, on the other hand, has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 430 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B710 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 430 is a desktop processor while Celeron B710 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Celeron B710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430
Intel Celeron B710
Celeron B710

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 160 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 100 votes

Rate Celeron B710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 430 or Celeron B710, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.