Ryzen 5 5600H vs Celeron 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated664
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23no data
Current price$34 (1.5x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 420 235
Ryzen 5 5600H 17022
+7143%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Celeron 420 by 7143% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 420 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 5600H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Ryzen 5 5600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 162 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4335 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 420 or Ryzen 5 5600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.