Core i3-8130U vs Celeron 3865U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.85
Core i3-8130U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.30
+171%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24691723
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-UKaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)13 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$281
Current price$296 (2.8x MSRP)$464 (1.7x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.7 mm2123 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356FCBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP--
Smart Response++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s37.5 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics 620
Max video memory32 GB32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3865U 0.85
i3-8130U 2.30
+171%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 3865U 1320
i3-8130U 3555
+169%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 169% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3865U 392
i3-8130U 991
+153%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 153% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3865U 691
i3-8130U 1845
+167%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 167% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron 3865U 2853
i3-8130U 5448
+90.9%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 91% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron 3865U 5425
i3-8130U 12157
+124%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 124% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron 3865U 39.36
i3-8130U 14.3
+175%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Core i3-8130U by 175% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron 3865U 2
i3-8130U 4
+127%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 127% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron 3865U 142
i3-8130U 338
+138%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 138% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron 3865U 72
i3-8130U 139
+93.1%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 93% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron 3865U 0.86
i3-8130U 1.63
+89.5%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 90% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 3865U 0.8
i3-8130U 2
+147%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 147% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 3865U 1108
i3-8130U 2168
+95.7%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 96% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 3865U 11
i3-8130U 22
+106%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 106% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron 3865U 54
i3-8130U 117
+114%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 114% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Celeron 3865U 3224
i3-8130U 7169
+122%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 122% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Celeron 3865U 1843
i3-8130U 3288
+78.4%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 78% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Celeron 3865U 3627
i3-8130U 7131
+96.6%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 97% in Geekbench 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Celeron 3865U 3564
i3-8130U 8132
+128%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 128% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Celeron 3865U 2182
i3-8130U 4155
+90.4%

Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron 3865U by 90% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 2.30
Integrated graphics card 1.84 2.66
Recency 3 January 2017 13 February 2018
Threads 2 4
Cost $107 $281

The Core i3-8130U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3865U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3865U and Core i3-8130U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U
Intel Core i3-8130U
Core i3-8130U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 97 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 726 votes

Rate Core i3-8130U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3865U or Core i3-8130U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.