Celeron 3215U vs 3865U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.85
+18.1%

3865U outperforms 3215U by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24692589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-UBroadwell (2015−2019)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107
Current price$296 (2.8x MSRP)$256 (2.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus support4 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size98.7 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency900 MHz850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.2/12
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3865U 0.85
+18.1%
Celeron 3215U 0.72

3865U outperforms 3215U by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 3865U 1320
+18.1%
Celeron 3215U 1118

3865U outperforms 3215U by 18% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3865U 392
+17.4%
Celeron 3215U 334

3865U outperforms 3215U by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3865U 691
+17.1%
Celeron 3215U 590

3865U outperforms 3215U by 17% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.72
Recency 3 January 2017 1 June 2015

The Celeron 3865U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3865U and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U
Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 97 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3865U or Celeron 3215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.