i9-13900K vs Celeron 3855U

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3855U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.80
Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
38.57
+4721%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Celeron 3855U by a whopping 4721% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking263087
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i9
Power efficiency4.8613.90
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date15 August 2015 (9 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier1630
L1 cache128 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache512 KB16 MB
L3 cache2 MB12 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size98.57 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency900 MHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3855U 0.80
i9-13900K 38.57
+4721%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3855U 1219
i9-13900K 59031
+4743%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3855U 315
i9-13900K 3005
+854%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3855U 538
i9-13900K 20243
+3663%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 38.57
Integrated graphics card 1.61 6.15
Recency 15 August 2015 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron 3855U has 733.3% lower power consumption.

i9-13900K, on the other hand, has a 4721.3% higher aggregate performance score, 282% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3855U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3855U is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3855U and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3855U
Celeron 3855U
Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 29 votes

Rate Celeron 3855U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1902 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3855U or Core i9-13900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.