Xeon E-2414 vs Celeron 3765U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2613not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.95no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$225

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size82 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414.

PCIe version2.05
PCI Express lanes1216

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2015 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron 3765U has 266.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2414, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 3765U is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2414 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and Xeon E-2414, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
Intel Xeon E-2414
Xeon E-2414

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2414 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or Xeon E-2414, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.