Xeon D-2896NT vs Celeron 3765U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2631not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.98no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads240
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1168FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt117 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB1 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1232
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2015 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 40
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 117 Watt

Celeron 3765U has 680% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-2896NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 3765U is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2896NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and Xeon D-2896NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
Intel Xeon D-2896NT
Xeon D-2896NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2896NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or Xeon D-2896NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.