i7-12700K vs Celeron 3765U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3765U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.79
Core i7-12700K
2021
12 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
21.78
+2657%

Core i7-12700K outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 2657% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2631244
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.84
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i7
Power efficiency4.9816.48
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)4 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data4
Threads220
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rate5 GT/s8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size82 mm2215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s76.805 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency850 MHz1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3765U 0.79
i7-12700K 21.78
+2657%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3765U 1252
i7-12700K 34598
+2663%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 21.78
Integrated graphics card 0.77 6.16
Recency 1 June 2015 4 November 2021
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron 3765U has 733.3% lower power consumption.

i7-12700K, on the other hand, has a 2657% higher aggregate performance score, 700% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-12700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3765U is a notebook processor while Core i7-12700K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and Core i7-12700K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
Intel Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2023 votes

Rate Core i7-12700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or Core i7-12700K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.