Core Ultra 7 155U vs Celeron 3765U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3765U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.81
Core Ultra 7 155U
2023
12 cores / 142 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 15 Watt
10.64
+1214%

Ultra 7 155U outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 1214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2507681
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Meteor Lake-U
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Meteor Lake-P
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$369 (3.4x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2142 x 4.8  GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core8 x 3.8  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core2 x 2.1  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPPno data-
Smart Response-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHz1.95 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/1212.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1220
PCI supportno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3765U 0.81
Ultra 7 155U 10.64
+1214%

Core Ultra 7 155U outperforms Celeron 3765U by 1214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 3765U 1252
Ultra 7 155U 16453
+1214%

Core Ultra 7 155U outperforms Celeron 3765U by 1214% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 10.64
Recency 1 June 2015 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 142 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Core Ultra 7 155U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and Core Ultra 7 155U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
Core Ultra 7 155U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or Core Ultra 7 155U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.