Ryzen 3 3200G vs Celeron 3215U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.68
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.49
+560%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 560% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27201313
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.90
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency4.296.54
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size82 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3215U 0.68
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.49
+560%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3215U 1083
Ryzen 3 3200G 7130
+558%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3215U 332
Ryzen 3 3200G 1076
+224%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3215U 588
Ryzen 3 3200G 3066
+421%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 4.49
Recency 1 June 2015 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 3215U has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3200G, on the other hand, has a 560.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3215U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3115 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3215U or Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.