Ryzen 3 3100 vs Celeron 3215U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.72

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 971% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2591892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronMatisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$99
Current price$256 (2.4x MSRP)$130 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size82 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1300 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3215U 0.72
Ryzen 3 3100 7.71
+971%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron 3215U by 971% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 3215U 1118
Ryzen 3 3100 11928
+967%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron 3215U by 967% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3215U 334
Ryzen 3 3100 1485
+345%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron 3215U by 345% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 3215U 590
Ryzen 3 3100 5105
+765%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron 3215U by 765% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 7.71
Recency 1 June 2015 24 April 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Cost $107 $99
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3215U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3215U and Ryzen 3 3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1570 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3215U or Ryzen 3 3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.