EPYC 9355P vs Celeron 2970M
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2521 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 2.40 | no data |
Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Turin (2024) |
Release date | 14 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | $2,998 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 64 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.55 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 130 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 960 Million | 66,520 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCPGA946 | SP5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors | N/A |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
VGA | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 April 2014 | 10 October 2024 |
Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
Threads | 2 | 64 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 280 Watt |
Celeron 2970M has 656.8% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9355P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 2970M is a notebook processor while EPYC 9355P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2970M and EPYC 9355P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.