EPYC 9575F vs Celeron 2957U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2837not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.41no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Turin (2024)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$11,791

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1168SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes10128
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron 2957U has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 2957U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2957U and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2957U
Celeron 2957U
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 70 votes

Rate Celeron 2957U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2957U or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.