Xeon Gold 6423N vs Celeron 2950M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6423N outperforms Celeron 2950M by a whopping 4557% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2896 | 146 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.80 | 7.08 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | no data |
| Release date | 1 September 2013 (12 years ago) | 1 July 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 52.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 85 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCPGA946 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 195 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| VGA | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2950M and Xeon Gold 6423N.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.70 | 32.60 |
| Recency | 1 September 2013 | 1 July 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 195 Watt |
Celeron 2950M has 427% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6423N, on the other hand, has a 4557.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Gold 6423N is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 2950M in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 2950M is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6423N is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
