Atom N280 vs Celeron 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and Atom N280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)1 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and Atom N280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate533 MHz666.66 MT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cache64 KB56 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size77 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors105 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375V0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA479PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Atom N280 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 220 and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 220 209
+33.1%
Atom N280 157

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 2 Watt

Atom N280 has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 220 and Atom N280. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and Atom N280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
Intel Atom N280
Atom N280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 59 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 220 or Atom N280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.