7 160UL vs Celeron 2.10

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3294not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Release dateNovember 2002 (22 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache8 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache128 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm10 nm
Die size146 mm2no data
Number of transistors55 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket4781700
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 15 Watt

7 160UL has 900% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 386.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.10 and Core 7 160UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2.10
Celeron 2.10
Intel Core 7 160UL
Core 7 160UL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 2.10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 160UL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2.10 or Core 7 160UL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.