Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Celeron 1020M

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2900	1749
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.53
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Xeon Bronze
Power efficiency	no data	4.11
Designer	Intel	Intel
Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date	20 January 2013 (12 years ago)	11 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	$306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.1 GHz	3 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	no data	17
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	11 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Die size	118 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	8,000 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	FCPGA988	FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	-
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size	32 GB	768 GB
Max memory channels	2	6
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors	no data
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1020M and Xeon Bronze 3106.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	16	48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.72	3.26
Recency	20 January 2013	11 July 2017
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	85 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---