A6-5357M vs Celeron 1020M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron 1020M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads
0.82
+9.3%

Celeron 1020M outperforms A6-5357M by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24582528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$59 (0.7x MSRP)$49

Detailed Specifications

Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FP2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 8450G
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1020M 0.82
+9.3%
A6-5357M 0.75

Celeron 1020M outperforms A6-5357M by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1020M 1275
+9.4%
A6-5357M 1165

Celeron 1020M outperforms A6-5357M by 9% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.82 0.75
Recency 20 January 2013 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020M and A6-5357M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1020M
Celeron 1020M
AMD A6-5357M
A6-5357M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Celeron 1020M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate A6-5357M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1020M or A6-5357M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.