Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Celeron 1020E
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Celeron 1020E by a whopping 2273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2843 | 366 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.26 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (12 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1020E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 40 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 2x 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 7,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1020E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | G2 (988B) | WRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB + 2 MB | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron 1020E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1020E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.80 | 18.98 |
| Recency | 20 January 2013 | 14 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 280 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has a 2272.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 82.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 1020E in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 1020E is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
