Opteron 4334 vs Celeron 1020E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1020E
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.88
Opteron 4334
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.47
+181%

Opteron 4334 outperforms Celeron 1020E by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25851786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.402.48
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Seoul (2012)
Release date20 January 2013 (12 years ago)4 December 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)288 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6144 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketG2 (988B)C32
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1020E 0.88
Opteron 4334 2.47
+181%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1020E 1406
Opteron 4334 3949
+181%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 2.47
Recency 20 January 2013 4 December 2012
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron 1020E has an age advantage of 1 month, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Opteron 4334, on the other hand, has a 180.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Opteron 4334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1020E in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1020E is a notebook processor while Opteron 4334 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020E and Opteron 4334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1020E
Celeron 1020E
AMD Opteron  4334
Opteron 4334

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron 1020E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 4334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1020E or Opteron 4334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.