EPYC 9475F vs Celeron 1020E

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2554	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	2.39	no data
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Turin (2024)
Release date	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)	10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$7,592

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads	2	96
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	4.8 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	4 nm
Die size	118 mm2	8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	66,520 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2
Socket	G2 (988B)	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

+

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	128

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	20 January 2013	10 October 2024
Physical cores	2	48
Threads	2	96
Chip lithography	22 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	400 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---