Ultra 7 265K vs Celeron 1019Y

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated86
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data89.89
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiencyno data28.22
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$153$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA10231851
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1019Y 576
Ultra 7 265K 59223
+10182%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2013 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron 1019Y has 1150% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 1019Y is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1019Y and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1019Y
Celeron 1019Y
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 1019Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 63 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1019Y or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.