E2-3000 vs E-450
Aggregate performance score
E-450 outperforms E2-3000 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing E-450 and E2-3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2895 | 2926 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD E-Series | AMD E-Series |
| Power efficiency | 2.52 | 2.90 |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-450 and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.65 GHz | 1.65 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E-450 and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and E2-3000 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6320 | AMD Radeon HD 8280 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E-450 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E-450 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-450 and E2-3000.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.48 | 0.46 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.38 | 0.67 |
| Recency | 22 August 2011 | 23 May 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 15 Watt |
E-450 has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score.
E2-3000, on the other hand, has 76.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E-450 and E2-3000.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and E2-3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
