EPYC 9825 vs Celeron 1017U
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2517 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.26 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 1 July 2013 (11 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $13,006 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 144 |
| Threads | 2 | 288 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1023 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 390 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| My WiFi | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors | N/A |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| SDVO | + | no data |
| CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2013 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 144 |
| Threads | 2 | 288 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 390 Watt |
Celeron 1017U has 2194.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9825, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 7100% more physical cores and 14300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 1017U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9825 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1017U and EPYC 9825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
