Core i5-12500H vs Celeron 1007U
Aggregate performance score
i5-12500H outperforms Celeron 1007U by a whopping 2435% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2797 | 526 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 35 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Alder Lake-P |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Alder Lake-H (2022) |
| Release date | 21 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 15 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 1.1 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 10 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 18 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1023 | BGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.54 | 13.69 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.63 | 7.55 |
| Recency | 21 January 2013 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron 1007U has 164.7% lower power consumption.
i5-12500H, on the other hand, has a 2435.2% higher aggregate performance score, 1098.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i5-12500H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1007U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Core i5-12500H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
