Ryzen 5 2600 vs Celeron 1005M

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.30
+1086%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Celeron 1005M by a whopping 1086% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2702903
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.82
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency1.8912.08
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data34
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache2 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die size94 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors-
Clear Video--
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70
Ryzen 5 2600 8.30
+1086%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1108
Ryzen 5 2600 13189
+1090%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1005M 326
Ryzen 5 2600 1163
+257%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1005M 563
Ryzen 5 2600 4896
+770%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 8.30
Recency 1 July 2013 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 1005M has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has a 1085.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1005M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14959 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.