Celeron N4500 vs 1005M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads
0.71
Celeron N4500
2021
2 cores / 2 threads
1.26
+77.5%

N4500 outperforms 1005M by 77% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25612165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date1 July 2013 (10 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$36 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Technical specs

Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.71
Celeron N4500 1.26
+77.5%

N4500 outperforms 1005M by 77% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1005M 1108
Celeron N4500 1972
+78%

N4500 outperforms 1005M by 78% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1005M 326
Celeron N4500 443
+35.9%

N4500 outperforms 1005M by 36% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1005M 552
Celeron N4500 717
+29.9%

N4500 outperforms 1005M by 30% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.71 1.26
Recency 1 July 2013 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

The Celeron N4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Celeron N4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Celeron N4500
Celeron N4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 225 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 577 votes

Rate Celeron N4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Celeron N4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.