Celeron G6900 vs 1005M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.71
Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.94
+314%

G6900 outperforms 1005M by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26011575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.53
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 July 2013 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$36 (0.4x MSRP)$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.71
Celeron G6900 2.94
+314%

G6900 outperforms 1005M by 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1005M 1101
Celeron G6900 4550
+313%

G6900 outperforms 1005M by 313% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1005M 328
Celeron G6900 1647
+402%

G6900 outperforms 1005M by 402% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1005M 558
Celeron G6900 2760
+395%

G6900 outperforms 1005M by 395% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 2.94
Recency 1 July 2013 4 January 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 46 Watt

The Celeron G6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1005M is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Celeron G6900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 233 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 158 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Celeron G6900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.