Celeron 3205U vs 1005M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.71
+16.4%

1005M outperforms 3205U by a moderate 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25932675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Broadwell-U (2015)
Release date1 July 2013 (10 years ago)1 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$107
Current price$36 (0.4x MSRP)$182 (1.7x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz800 MHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.71
+16.4%
Celeron 3205U 0.61

1005M outperforms 3205U by 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1005M 1099
+15.8%
Celeron 3205U 949

1005M outperforms 3205U by 16% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1005M 327
+25.3%
Celeron 3205U 261

1005M outperforms 3205U by 25% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1005M 556
+19.8%
Celeron 3205U 464

1005M outperforms 3205U by 20% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.61
Recency 1 July 2013 1 March 2015
Cost $86 $107
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

The Celeron 1005M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3205U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Celeron 3205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Celeron 3205U
Celeron 3205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 231 vote

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Celeron 3205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.