Celeron 5305U vs 1000M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2766not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.82no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)no data
Release date20 January 2013 (12 years ago)1 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Bus rate5 GT/s4 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nmno data
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketG2 (988B)no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2013 1 April 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 5305U has an age advantage of 7 years, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1000M and Celeron 5305U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1000M
Celeron 1000M
Intel Celeron 5305U
Celeron 5305U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 170 votes

Rate Celeron 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 5305U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1000M or Celeron 5305U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.