Xeon Platinum 8368 vs C-70

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated15
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.30
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD C-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 September 2012 (11 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$107 $12855

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)38
Threads276
Base clock speed1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm10 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6290no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

C-70 315
Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+29123%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms C-70 by 29123% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2012 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 38
Threads 2 76
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 270 Watt

We couldn't decide between C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that C-70 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-70 and Xeon Platinum 8368, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-70
C-70
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 86 votes

Rate C-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 88 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-70 or Xeon Platinum 8368, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.