A6-9220C vs C-70
Primary details
Comparing C-70 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2735 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | no data | 10.49 |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 1 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-70 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 18 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on C-70 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-70 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-70 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-70 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-70 and A6-9220C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2012 | 6 January 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 6 Watt |
A6-9220C has an age advantage of 6 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between C-70 and A6-9220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-70 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
