Xeon D-2775TE vs C-60
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-2775TE outperforms C-60 by a whopping 8500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3517 | 506 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.75 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.14 | 16.60 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 22 August 2011 (14 years ago) | 24 February 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,751 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
C-60 and Xeon D-2775TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 25 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on C-60 and Xeon D-2775TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-60 and Xeon D-2775TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
C-60 and Xeon D-2775TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-60 and Xeon D-2775TE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-60 and Xeon D-2775TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-60 and Xeon D-2775TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 15.48 |
| Recency | 22 August 2011 | 24 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 100 Watt |
C-60 has 1011.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2775TE, on the other hand, has a 8500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon D-2775TE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD C-60 in performance tests.
Be aware that C-60 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2775TE is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
