GX-210JA vs C-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

C-60
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.20
+25%
GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16

C-60 outperforms GX-210JA by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing C-60 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32193292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD C-SeriesAMD
Power efficiency2.102.52
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Temash (2013)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

C-60 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.33 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on C-60 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-60 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-60 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-60 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6290no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

C-60 0.20
+25%
GX-210JA 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

C-60 316
+27.4%
GX-210JA 248

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.16
Recency 22 August 2011 23 May 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 6 Watt

C-60 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The C-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-60 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-60
C-60
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 242 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-60 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.