Ryzen 3 4300U vs C-50

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD C-SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Architecture codenameOntario (2011−2012)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$83 $520

Detailed specifications

C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm
Die size75 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFP6
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6250AMD Radeon RX Vega 5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

C-50 265
Ryzen 3 4300U 7445
+2709%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms C-50 by 2709% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

C-50 72
Ryzen 3 4300U 1248
+1633%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms C-50 by 1633% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

C-50 124
Ryzen 3 4300U 3369
+2617%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms C-50 by 2617% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

C-50 636
Ryzen 3 4300U 6068
+855%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms C-50 by 855% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 6 January 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between C-50 and Ryzen 3 4300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD C-50
C-50
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 263 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 915 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about C-50 or Ryzen 3 4300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.