Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Atom x7-Z8750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-Z8750
2016, $37
4 cores / 4 threads
0.74
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018, $899
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
16.84
+2176%

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a whopping 2176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2937466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.91
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series7x Intel AtomAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiencyno data3.95
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 April 2016 (9 years ago)6 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.56 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1635
L1 cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA1380Socket TR4
Power consumption (TDP)W180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s93.867 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)-
Max video memory8 GB-
Graphics max frequency600 MHz-
Execution Units16-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160-
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes2no data
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom x7-Z8750 0.74
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16.84
+2176%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom x7-Z8750 1294
Samples: 101
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 29487
+2179%
Samples: 1000

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x7-Z8750 181
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 1256
+594%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x7-Z8750 520
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 8477
+1530%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom x7-Z8750 24.7
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 4.19
+489%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Atom x7-Z8750 133
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 3110
+2238%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Atom x7-Z8750 39
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 176
+352%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom x7-Z8750 1
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 19.5
+1931%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Atom x7-Z8750 48
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 202
+321%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Atom x7-Z8750 10
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 145
+1349%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Atom x7-Z8750 807
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 4548
+464%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 16.84
Recency 1 April 2016 6 August 2018
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has a 2175.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x7-Z8750 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 24 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 71 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom x7-Z8750 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.